Organizing the Church School is a practical handbook by Henry Frederick Cope on the administrative organization of American Protestant religious education programs during the Progressive era. It belongs to Cope’s body of writing produced during his service as General Secretary of the Religious Education Association from 1907 until his death in 1923.
The book addresses the practical organizational questions that ministers and lay leaders faced when trying to bring their Sunday schools and other religious education programs up to the standards that the Religious Education Association and the broader American religious education reform movement were advocating. The older nineteenth-century Sunday school pattern had developed organically across the various American Protestant denominations and had produced organizational arrangements that were often haphazard, under-supervised, and disconnected from the regular congregational ministry.
Cope works through the practical reform agenda in concrete administrative terms. The book covers the proper governance of religious education programs through duly constituted committees of the congregation. It addresses the recruitment and training of teachers, with attention to the substantial body of teacher preparation literature that was developing in the early twentieth century. It treats curriculum selection and the relationship between standardized denominational materials and locally developed content. It addresses age grouping, classroom organization, scheduling, record-keeping, and the various other administrative dimensions that distinguish a properly organized educational program from an ad hoc gathering.
The Progressive era management language runs through the book. Cope was writing during the same period when Frederick Winslow Taylor was producing his scientific management literature and when American business and government were both moving toward more systematic organizational practice. Religious education reformers like Cope absorbed the management vocabulary and applied it to church work, sometimes with results that critics found incongruous with the broader spiritual purposes of religious education.
The book is mostly of interest now to historians of American Protestant religious education and to specialists in the broader Progressive era reform movements. It pairs with Cope’s other writings on religious education and with the wider Religious Education Association publications of the period.