Gênero e os Nossos Cérebros

Gina Rippon · Capítulo 41 de 46

Páginas do PDF

Gênero e os Nossos Cérebros

aleatoriamente.[26]

Adults”, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 50 (2015), pp. 169-79. • 26. F. Simion e E. Di Giorgio, “Face Perception and Processing in Early Infancy: Inborn Predispositions and

Developmental Changes”, Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015), p. 969. • 27. V. M. Reid, K. Dunn, R. J. Young, J. Amu, T. Donovan e N. Reissland, “The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like

Visual Stimuli”, Current Biology 27:12 (2017), pp. 1825-8. • 28. S. J. McKelvie, “Sex Differences in

Memory for Faces”, Journal of Psychology 107:1 (1981), pp. 109-25. • 29. C. Lewin and A. Herlitz, “Sex Differences in Face Recognition — Women’s Faces Make the Difference”, Brain and Cognition

50:1 (2002), pp. 121-8. • 30. A. Herlitz e J. Loven, “Sex Differences and the Own-Gender Bias in

Face Recognition: A Meta-analytic Review”, Visual Cognition 21:9-10 (2013), pp. 1306-36. • 31. J. Loven, J. Svard, N. C. Ebner, A. Herlitz e H. Fischer, “Face Gender Modulates Women’s Brain Activity during Face Encoding”, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9:7 (2013), pp. 1000-

1005. • 32. Leeb e Rejskind, “Here’s Looking at You, Kid!”. • 33. H. Hoffmann, H. Kessler, T. Eppel, S. Rukavina e H. C. Traue, “Expression Intensity, Gender and Facial Emotion Recognition: Women Recognize Only Subtle Facial Emotions Better than Men”, Acta Psychologica 135:3 (2010), pp. 278-83; A. E. Thompson e D. Voyer, “Sex Differences in the Ability to Recognise Non-verbal Displays of

Emotion: A Meta-analysis”, Cognition and Emotion 28:7 (2014), pp. 1164-95. • 34. S. Baron-Cohen, S. Wheelwright, J. Hill, Y. Raste e I. Plumb, “The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test Revised Version: A Study with Normal Adults, and Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning

Autism”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42:2 (2001), pp. 241-51. • 35. E. B. McClure, “A Meta-analytic Review of Sex Differences in Facial Expression Processing and Their Development in Infants, Children, and Adolescents”, Psychological Bulletin 126:3 (2000), p. 424. •

36. Ibid. • 37. Ibid. • 38. Ibid. • 39. W. D. Rosen, L. B. Adamson e R. Bakeman, “An Experimental Investigation of Infant Social Referencing: Mothers’ Messages and Gender Differences”,

Developmental Psychology 28:6 (1992), p. 1172. • 40. A. N. Meltzoff e M. K. Moore, “Imitation of

Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates”, Science 198:4312 (1977), pp. 75-8. • 41. A. N. Meltzoff e M. K. Moore, “Imitation in Newborn Infants: Exploring the Range of Gestures Imitated

and the Underlying Mechanisms”, Developmental Psychology 25:6 (1989), p. 954. • 42. P. J. Marshall e A. N. Meltzoff, “Neural Mirroring Mechanisms and Imitation in Human Infants”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369:1644 (2014), 20130620; E. A. Simpson, L. Murray, A. Paukner e P. F. Ferrari, “The Mirror Neuron System as Revealed through Neonatal Imitation: Presence from Birth, Predictive Power and Evidence of Plasticity”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369:1644 (2014), 20130289.

• 43. E. Nagy e P. Molner, “Homo imitans or Homo provocans? Human Imprinting Model of

Neonatal Imitation”, Infant Behavior and Development 27:1 (2004), pp. 54-63. • 44. S. S. Jones, “Exploration or Imitation? The Effect of Music on 4-Week-Old Infants’ Tongue Protrusions”, Infant

Behavior and Development 29:1 (2006), pp. 126-30. • 45. J. Oostenbroek, T. Suddendorf, M. Nielsen, J. Redshaw, S. Kennedy-Costantini, J. Davis, S. Clark e V. Slaughter, “Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans”, Current Biology 26:10 (2016), pp. 1334-8; A. N. Meltzoff, L. Murray, E. Simpson, M. Heimann, E. Nagy, J. Nadel, E. J. Pedersen, R. Brooks, D. S. Messinger, L. D. Pascalis e F. Subiaul, “Re-examination of Oostenbroek et al. (2016): Evidence for Neonatal Imitation of Tongue Protrusion”, Developmental

Science 21:4 (2018), e12609. • 46. Oostenbroek et al., “Comprehensive Longitudinal Study Challenges the Existence of Neonatal Imitation in Humans”; Meltzoff et al., “Re-examination of

Oostenbroek et al. (2016)”. • 47. Nagy e Molner, “Homo imitans or Homo provocans?”. • 48. E. Nagy, H. Compagne, H. Orvos, A. Pal, P. Molnar, I. Janszky, K. Loveland e G. Bardos, “Index Finger Movement Imitation by Human Neonates: Motivation, Learning, and Left-Hand Preference”,

Pediatric Research 58:4 (2005), pp. 749-53. • 49. C. Trevarthen e K. J. Aitken, “Infant Intersubjectivity: Research, Theory, and Clinical Applications”, Journal of Child Psychology and