Capítulo 44

Archives of Sexual Behavior 39:6 (2010), pp. 1261-73. • 44. C. L. Martin, D. N. Ruble e J. Szkrybalo, “Cognitive Theories of Early Gender Development”, Psychological Bulletin 128:6

(2002), p. 903. • 45. L. Waterlow, “Too much in the pink! How toys have become alarmingly gender stereotyped since the Seventies... at the cost of little girls’ self-esteem”, Mail Online, 10 de junho de

2013, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2338976/Too-pink-How-toys-alarmingly-gender-

stereotyped-Seventies–cost-little-girls-self-esteem.html (acessado em 8 novembro de 2018). • 46. J. E. O. Blakemore e R. E. Centers, “Characteristics of Boys’ and Girls’ Toys”, Sex Roles 53:9–10

(2005), pp. 619-33. • 47. B. K. Todd, J. A. Barry e S. A. Thommessen, “Preferences for ‘Gender-Typed’ Toys in Boys and Girls Aged 9 to 32 Months”, Infant and Child Development 26:3 (2017),

e1986. • 48. Ibid. • 49. Ibid. • 50. C. Fine e E. Rush, “’Why Does All the Girls Have to Buy Pink Stuff?’ The Ethics and Science of the Gendered Toy Marketing Debate”, Journal of Business Ethics

149:4 (2018), pp. 769-84. • 51. B. K. Todd, R. A. Fischer, S. Di Costa, A. Roestorf, K. Harbour, P. Hardiman e J. A. Barry, “Sex Differences in Children’s Toy Preferences: A Systematic Review,

Meta-regression, and Meta-analysis”, Infant and Child Development 27:2 (2018), pp. 1-29. • 52.

Ibid., pp. 1-2. • 53. N. K. Freeman, “Preschoolers’ Perceptions of Gender Appropriate Toys and Their Parents’ Beliefs about Genderized Behaviors: Miscommunication, Mixed Messages, or Hidden

Truths?”, Early Childhood Education Journal 34:5 (2007), pp. 357-66. • 54. E. S. Weisgram, M. Fulcher e L. M. Dinella, “Pink Gives Girls Permission: Exploring the Roles of Explicit Gender Labels and Gender-Typed Colors on Preschool Children’s Toy Preferences”, Journal of Applied

Developmental Psychology 35:5 (2014), pp. 401-9. • 55. E. Sweet, “Toys are more divided by gender now than they were 50 years ago”, Atlantic, 9 de dezembro de 2014,

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/12/toys-are-more-divided-by-gender-now-than-

they-were-50-years-ago/383556 (acessado em 8 novembro de 2018). • 56. J. Stoeber e H. Yang, “Physical Appearance Perfectionism Explains Variance in Eating Disorder Symptoms above General

Perfectionism”, Personality and Individual Differences 86 (2015), pp. 303-7. • 57. J. F. Benenson, R. Tennyson e R. W. Wrangham, “Male More than Female Infants Imitate Propulsive Motion”,

Cognition 121:2 (2011), pp. 262-7. • 58. G. M. Alexander, T. Wilcox e R. Woods, “Sex Differences

in Infants’ Visual Interest in Toys”, Archives of Sexual Behavior 38:3 (2009), pp. 427-33. • 59. “Jo Swinson: Encourage boys to play with dolls”, BBC News, 13 de janeiro de 2015,

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30794476 (acessado em 8 de novembro de 2018). • 60. G. M. Alexander e M. Hines, “Sex Differences in Response to Children’s Toys in Nonhuman Primates

(Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus)”, Evolution and Human Behavior 23:6 (2002), pp. 467-79. • 61. Cordelia Fine em Delusions of Gender e Rebecca Jordan-Young em Brain Storm comentaram de forma bem-humorada e extensamente os estudos de macacos e seu papel exagerado como finte de

insights sobre preferência de brinquedos. • 62. J. M. Hassett, E. R. Siebert e K. Wallen, “Sex Differences in Rhesus Monkey Toy Preferences Parallel Those of Children”, Hormones and Behavior

54:3 (2008), pp. 359-64. • 63. Ibid., p. 363. • 64. Hines, Brain Gender. • 65. S. A. Berenbaum e M. Hines, “Early Androgens Are Related to Childhood Sex-Typed Toy Preferences”, Psychological

Science 3:3 (1992), pp. 203-6. • 66. M. Hines, V. Pasterski, D. Spencer, S. Neufeld, P. Patalay, P. C. Hindmarsh, I. A. Hughes e C. L. Acerini, “Prenatal Androgen Exposure Alters Girls’ Responses to Information Indicating Gender-Appropriate Behaviour”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal

Society B: Biological Sciences 371:1688 (2016), 20150125. • 67. M. C. Linn e A. C. Petersen, “Emergence and Characterization of Sex Differences in Spatial Ability: A Meta-analysis”, Child

Development 56:6 (1985), pp. 1479-98. • 68. D. I. Miller e D. F. Halpern, “The New Science of

Cognitive Sex Differences”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18:1 (2014), pp. 37-45. • 69. Hines et al.,

“Prenatal Androgen Exposure Alters Girls’ Responses”. • 70. M. S. Terlecki e N. S. Newcombe, “How Important Is the Digital Divide? The Relation of Computer and Videogame Usage to Gender